Two judges criticises court’s majority decision

Abdirahman Hussein
By Abdirahman Hussein September 20, 2017 22:27


Supreme Court judge Justice Jackton Ojwang claimed the nullified election was conducted in a credible manner and said the decision that quashed President Kenyatta’s was precarious.

The judge said the claim by the opposition leader did not warrant the nullification of the election, judge Justice Jackton Ojwang pointed that the opposition hinged on only one pillar of the electoral process— transmission of results.

The judge said the decision by the  majority was politically motivated and lacked validity and failed to keep the path set  by law saying it was based on weak grounds.

“I am opinion the majority decision fails to resonate with the Constitution and the law,” he said.

Judge Njoki Ndung’u has also faulted the decision by the majority saying  the legitimate winner of the August 8 Presidential Poll was, would have best been cleared up through a verification of the number of ballots cast in favour of each candidate – a recount

“The court must be satisfied that the violations claimed are solid, not imagined,”Ndung’u said.


Do you have something to add to this story? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Your comments:

Abdirahman Hussein
By Abdirahman Hussein September 20, 2017 22:27

Photo of the day!

Happy Mashujaa Day

About NJ

Nep Journal is a progressive media initiative that aims to serve as the leading space where North Eastern Kenya’s leading thinkers, analysts and writers provide you, our readers, with new perspectives on all issues affecting the region.

We aim to publish daring perspectives with original content, and beautifully written pieces so as to empower, educate and inform our people.

Get in touch with NJ

Do you have anything to share with us? We value your input and contribution. You can send us your opinion pieces, articles or any other relevant information. Email: publisher @ nepjournal . com or click here